Increased complexity of gene structure and base composition in vertebrates

State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Biology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China

More Information

Corresponding author: E-mail address: dtian@nju.edu.cn (Dacheng Tian); E-mail address: haiwangyang@gmail.com (Haiwang Yang)

These authors contributed equally to this work.

摘要

- /
- /
- /
- /
- /
Abstract: How the structure and base composition of genes changed with the evolution of vertebrates remains a puzzling question. Here we analyzed 895 orthologous protein-coding genes in six multicellular animals: human, chicken, zebrafish, sea squirt, fruit fly, and worm. Our analyses reveal that many gene regions, particularly intron and 3′ UTR, gradually expanded throughout the evolution of vertebrates from their invertebrate ancestors, and that the number of exons per gene increased. Studies based on all protein-coding genes in each genome provide consistent results. We also find that GC-content increased in many gene regions (especially 5′ UTR) in the evolution of endotherms, except in coding-exons. Analysis of individual genomes shows that 3′ UTR demonstrated stronger length and GC-content correlation with intron than 5′ UTR, and gene with large intron in all six species demonstrated relatively similar GC-content. Our data indicates a great increase in complexity in vertebrate genes and we propose that the requirement for morphological and functional changes is probably the driving force behind the evolution of structure and base composition complexity in multicellular animal genes.
- GC-content /
- Gene structure /
- Intron /
- UTR /
- Vertebrate /
- Endotherm
These authors contributed equally to this work.
注释:

HTML全文

参考文献(45)

[1]	Berget, S.M., Moore, C., Sharp, P.A. Spliced segments at the 5′ terminus of adenovirus 2 late mRNA Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 74 (1977),pp. 3171-3175
[2]	Bernardi, G. The neoselectionist theory of genome evolution Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104 (2007),pp. 8385-8390
[3]	Bertrand, S., Camasses, A., Escriva, H. J. Soc. Biol., 201 (2007),pp. 51-57
[4]	Bharti, K., Nguyen, M.T., Skuntz, S. et al. The other pigment cell: specification and development of the pigmented epithelium of the vertebrate eye Pigment Cell Res., 19 (2006),pp. 380-394
[5]	Bonen, L., Vogel, J. The ins and outs of group II introns Trends Genet., 17 (2001),pp. 322-331
[6]	Borst, A. Curr. Biol., 19 (2009),pp. R36-R47
[7]	Cañestro, C., Bassham, S., Postlethwait, J.H. Genome Biol., 4 (2003),p. 208
[8]	Charlesworth, B., Barton, N. Genome size: does bigger mean worse? Curr. Biol., 14 (2004),pp. R233-R235
[9]	Chojnowski, J.L., Franklin, J., Katsu, Y. et al. Patterns of vertebrate isochore evolution revealed by comparison of expressed mammalian, avian, and crocodilian genes J. Mol. Evol., 65 (2007),pp. 259-266
[10]	Chow, L.T., Gelinas, R.E., Broker, T.R. et al. An amazing sequence arrangement at the 5′ ends of adenovirus 2 messenger RNA Cell, 12 (1977),pp. 1-8
[11]	Comeron, J.M. What controls the length of noncoding DNA? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 11 (2001),pp. 652-659
[12]	Curtis, D., Lehmann, R., Zamore, P.D. Translational regulation in development Cell, 81 (1995),pp. 171-178
[13]	Day, D.A., Tuite, M.F. Post-transcriptional gene regulatory mechanisms in eukaryotes: an overview J. Endocrinol., 157 (1998),pp. 361-371
[14]	Dehal, P., Satou, Y., Campbell, R.K. et al. Science, 298 (2002),pp. 2157-2167
[15]	Derrigo, M., Cestelli, A., Savettieri, G. et al. RNA-protein interactions in the control of stability and localization of messenger RNA (review) Int. J. Mol. Med., 5 (2000),pp. 111-123
[16]	Fritzsch, B., Pauley, S., Beisel, K.W. Cells, molecules and morphogenesis: the making of the vertebrate ear Brain Res., 1091 (2006),pp. 151-171
[17]	Fortes, G.G., Bouza, C., Martínez, P. et al. Diversity in isochore structure among cold-blooded vertebrates based on GC content of coding and non-coding sequences Genetica, 129 (2007),pp. 281-289
[18]	Gazave, E., Marques-Bonet, T., Fernando, O. et al. Patterns and rates of intron divergence between humans and chimpanzees Genome Biol., 8 (2007),p. R21
[19]	Giroux, M.J., Clancy, M., Baier, J. et al. De novo synthesis of an intron by the maize transposable element Dissociation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91 (1994),pp. 12150-12154
[20]	Hughes, A.L., Yeager, M. Molecular evolution of the vertebrate immune system Bioessays, 19 (1997),pp. 777-786
[21]	Jeffares, D.C., Mourier, T., Penny, D. The biology of intron gain and loss Trends Genet., 22 (2006),pp. 16-22
[22]	Ji, Q., Luo, Z.X., Yuan, C.X. et al. The earliest known eutherian mammal Nature, 416 (2002),pp. 816-822
[23]	Lynch, M., Conery, J.S. The origins of genome complexity Science, 302 (2003),pp. 1401-1404
[24]	Lynch, M. The origins of eukaryotic gene structure Mol. Biol. Evol., 23 (2006),pp. 450-468
[25]	Lockery, S. Channeling the worm: microfluidic devices for nematode neurobiology Nat. Methods, 4 (2007),pp. 691-692
[26]	Maina, J.N. Development, structure, and function of a novel respiratory organ, the lung-air sac system of birds: to go where no other vertebrate has gone Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc., 81 (2006),pp. 545-579
[27]	Majewski, J., Ott, J. Distribution and characterization of regulatory elements in the human genome Genome Res., 12 (2002),pp. 1827-1836
[28]	Mattick, J.S., Gagen, M.J. The evolution of controlled multitasked gene networks: the role of introns and other noncoding RNAs in the development of complex organisms Mol. Biol. Evol., 18 (2001),pp. 1611-1630
[29]	McGlinn, E., Tabin, C.J. Mechanistic insight into how Shh patterns the vertebrate limb Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 16 (2006),pp. 426-432
[30]	Meijer, H.A., Thomas, A.A. Control of eukaryotic protein synthesis by upstream open reading frames in the 5′-untranslated region of an mRNA Biochem. J., 367 (2002),pp. 1-11
[31]	Mourier, T., Jeffares, D.C. Eukaryotic intron loss Science, 300 (2003),p. 1393
[32]	Ohno, S. The reason for as well as the consequence of the cambrian explosion in animal evolution J. Mol. Evol., 44 (1997),pp. S23-S27
[33]	Oliver, M.J., Petrov, D., Ackerly, D. et al. The mode and tempo of genome size evolution in eukaryotes Genome Res., 17 (2007),pp. 594-601
[34]	Parmley, J.L., Urrutia, A.O., Potrzebowski, L. et al. Splicing and the evolution of proteins in mammals PLoS Biol., 5 (2007),p. e14
[35]	Popper, A.N., Fay, R.R. Evolution of the ear and hearing: issues and questions Brain Behav. Evol., 50 (1997),pp. 213-221
[36]	Rogozin, I.B., Wolf, Y.I., Sorokin, A.V. et al. Remarkable interkingdom conservation of intron positions and massive, lineage-specific intron loss and gain in eukaryotic evolution Curr. Biol., 13 (2003),pp. 1512-1517
[37]	Romer, A.S. Major steps in vertebrate evolution Science, 158 (1967),pp. 1629-1637
[38]	Rubin, G.M., Lewis, E.B. Science, 287 (2000),pp. 2216-2218
[39]	Seilacher, A., Bose, P.K., Pflüer, F. Triploblastic animals more than 1 billion years ago: trace fossil evidence from India Science, 282 (1998),pp. 80-83
[40]	Shimeld, S.M., Holland, P.W. Vertebrate innovations Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97 (2000),pp. 4449-4452
[41]	Sverdlov, A.V., Babenko, V.N., Rogozin, I.B. et al. Preferential loss and gain of introns in 3′ portions of genes suggests a reverse-transcription mechanism of intron insertion Gene, 338 (2004),pp. 85-91
[42]	Tautz, D. Chordate evolution in a new light Cell, 113 (2003),pp. 812-813
[43]	Tian, D., Wang, Q., Zhang, P. et al. Single-nucleotide mutation rate increases close to indels in eukaryotes Nature, 455 (2008),pp. 105-108
[44]	Yang, H., Wu, Y., Feng, J. et al. Evolutionary pattern of protein architecture in mammal and fruit fly genomes Genomics, 93 (2009),pp. 90-97
[45]	Zhu, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, W. et al. Patterns of exon-intron architecture variation of genes in eukaryotic genomes BMC Genomics, 10 (2009),p. 47